Automation3 min readBy Published

Zapier, n8n or a custom build: which should you use?

We get this question a lot, often from someone who has already built forty zaps and is starting to worry about them. There's no single right answer, but there is a fairly reliable way to decide.

Short answer

Use Zapier or Make when the job is a few simple steps between popular apps and nobody on the team is technical. Use n8n when you need branching logic or self-hosting and someone can look after it. Choose a custom build when the workflow is core to how you make money, handles sensitive data or high volume, or includes AI decisions you need to test and audit.

The three options side by side

All three can move data between your apps when something happens. The differences show up later: who can fix it when it breaks, what it costs at ten times the volume, and whether anyone can tell what happened last Tuesday.

Zapier or Make, n8n and a custom build

Zapier / Make

Best for
A few simple steps between popular apps
Who looks after it
Anyone on the team
Where it runs
Their cloud
Cost as volume grows
Rises with every task
Testing and history
Run history

n8n

Best for
Branching flows with some code
Who looks after it
Someone technical
Where it runs
Their cloud or your server
Cost as volume grows
Lower, especially self-hosted
Testing and history
Execution logs

Custom build

Best for
Core, high-volume or sensitive workflows
Who looks after it
A developer or a partner
Where it runs
Your cloud or server
Cost as volume grows
Mostly a fixed running cost
Testing and history
Tests, logs and alerts

Learn it yourself or hire someone?

If the automation is small and not central to the business, learn it yourself. Zapier takes an afternoon, and you'll understand your own process better for having wired it up.

Hire when a failure costs real money, when the flow touches customer or financial data, or when it spans several systems that each change on their own schedule. Also hire when the honest answer to "who fixes this when it breaks?" is nobody.

A quick way to decide
  • One or two steps between well-known apps

    Do it yourself in Zapier or Make.

  • Lots of branches, and you have a technical person

    n8n, looked after in-house.

  • Errors cost money or touch customer data

    Bring in help and add monitoring.

  • It's core to how you make money

    A custom build that you own.

Signs you've outgrown no-code

The monthly bill grows faster than the business. Flows fail silently and someone notices a week later. Nobody remembers why step seven exists. You're building workarounds for features the tool doesn't have. A customer's security questionnaire asks where their data goes, and the honest answer is "through about six services".

One of these is normal. Three or four means the workflow has quietly become infrastructure, and it deserves to be treated that way.

The middle path most teams take

You rarely need to rip everything out. Keep the simple zaps that work. Move the one or two workflows that matter most into a small custom service with tests, logs and an alert when something fails. That's usually where we start too, and it costs far less than rebuilding everything.

Questions people also ask

Is n8n free?

You can self-host n8n's community edition without a license fee under its fair-code license, and there are paid cloud plans. Self-hosting still costs a server and someone's time to update and monitor it.

Can you take over our existing Zapier or n8n flows?

Yes. We review what you have, keep what works and rebuild the critical flows with tests and monitoring. You don't have to switch everything at once.

How long does a custom automation take?

A first workflow usually takes a few weeks, depending on how many systems it touches and how good their APIs are. We scope it after a short look at the process.

Related service

Got a workflow that keeps breaking? Show us.

Talk to us

More articles

What we learn building AI, sent to your inbox

Our newsletter

Practical AI notes for growing businesses. One email a month.